HK 'democrats' go against mainstream opinion

Democratic politics should follow mainstream opinion, and any political leader or organization that ignores mainstream opinion is doomed to failure.

Democratic politics cannot be isolated from political rules, because only when political rules are widely recognized and accepted can democratic politics work. Democratic politics will end in disaster if it goes against political rules, a fact that has been proved time and again.

Of the two parts of political rules for Hong Kong, one is determined by the city's constitutional status, which involves the basic rules for the political relationship between the central government and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and the other is concerned with legal rules, including the Basic Law of the SAR and decisions made by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the top legislature body, under the framework of the Basic Law.

But the pan-democracy camp in Hong Kong seems to ignore the two basic elements of democratic politics on the issue of electing the SAR's chief executive (CE) through universal suffrage.

On Aug 31, 2014, the NPC Standing Committee took a decision on the Hong Kong CE's election according to the actual situation in the SAR and the relevant regulations of the Basic Law. But the pan-democracy camp refused to accept it.

In doing so, the so-called camp has challenged the central government's authority and questioned the sanctity of the relationship between the central government and Hong Kong. Also, the pan-democracy camp has stuck to its demand that parties and individuals have the right to nominate candidates for the CE's post even though it violates Article 45 of the Basic Law. And despite the central government strictly adhering to the Basic Law in carrying out constitutional reform in Hong Kong, the so-called democrats organized the 'Occupy Central' campaign to confront the central government.

The pan-democracy camp as well as pro-establishment group have conducted opinion surveys. Each political group should follow the change in public opinion on constitutional reforms and make adjustments accordingly.

The mainstream social opinion in Hong Kong today is more inclined toward promoting constitutional reform. The signature campaign for universal suffrage carried out by the Alliance for Peace and Democracy and other group's opinion surveys show that more than 60 percent Hong Kong residents support the central government's constitutional reform plan for the SAR. Considering the 'silent majority' in Hong Kong, we can conclude that the mainstream opinion in the city supports constitutional reform as prescribed by the central government.

Despite the clear public support and political rules for Hong Kong's constitutional reform, the pan-democracy camp rejected the constitutional reform plan in the SAR Legislative Council's vote. This goes against the mainstream opinion and breaks the basic rules for the development of democracy in Hong Kong.

The pan-democracy camp has always viewed the central government's plans for Hong Kong's democratic reform with suspicion. It doubts the central government's determination and sincerity in carrying out democratic reform. But why would the central government advance two objectives of universal suffrage in the Basic Law if it didn't want to carry out democratic reforms in Hong Kong?

Hong Kong's constitutional reform in this round involves the city's future vital interests and the NPC Standing Committee's Aug 31 decision has taken that into consideration.

Given that a majority of Hong Kong residents support the central government advocated constitutional reform, the pan-democracy camp's rejection of the plan goes against mainstream public opinion and political rules. The pan-democracy camp is trying to deprive the about 5 million Hong Kong residents who are eligible to vote in favor of the policies they support, which is tantamount to depriving them of their right to choose between good and bad.

作者：张定淮，深圳大学法学院教授，香港基本法澳门基本法研究会理事。

（本文来自中国日报，不代表本文观点，原文请参见http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-06/10/content_20955629.htm）