打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
一问一答:神经病理在弥漫性低级别胶质瘤治疗中的作用

神经病理在弥漫性低级别胶质瘤治疗中的作用:系统性回顾和证据支持的临床实践指南

The role ofneuropathology in the management of patients with diffuse low grade glioma: Asystematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

J Neurooncol. 2015Dec;125(3):531-49

写在前面:胶质瘤的众多分子生物学检测,看来不是每个都是必须的。我们不是巴菲特,我们中国人都缺钱,所以拒绝一股脑儿的全都检测才是上策

目标人群:≥18岁的成人疑似低级别弥漫性胶质瘤

问题:确诊成人低级别弥漫性胶质瘤最适当的神经病理学技术是什么?

建议:

1.     对有代表性的外科切除的病变标本,进行组织病理学分析的结果,应当被用来提供低级别弥漫性胶质瘤的诊断(LEVEL I)。

2.   冰冻切片和细胞病理学分析/涂片一起,应当被用来帮助术中诊断低级别弥漫性胶质瘤。切除的标本优于活检标本,能降低潜在的取样误差(LEVEL III)。

目标人群:组织学上已经被确诊为WHO 2级弥漫性胶质瘤

问题:成人(≥18岁)组织学上确诊的WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤是否必须要检测IDH1突变?如果需要,那么最合适的方法是?

建议:通过IDH1 R132H抗体和或IDH1/2突变热点测序IDH基因突变评价是低级别弥漫性胶质瘤高度特异性的检查。推荐作为低级别胶质瘤分类和诊断的附加检查(LEVEL II)。

目标人群:组织学上确诊的 WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤。

问题:组织学上确诊的 成人(≥18岁的)WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤,1p/19q缺失是否作为必须的检查?如果是,哪种方法最好?

建议:1p/19q杂合性缺失检测,可通过FISH,阵列-CGH或PCR等方法来检测,建议作为判断少枝胶质细胞肿瘤预后和选择治疗方案时使用(LEVEL III)。

目标人群:组织学上确诊的WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤

问题:组织学上确诊的 成人(≥18岁的)WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤MGMT启动子甲基化检测是否必须?如果是,怎样的检测方法最好?

建议:没有足够的证据来推荐将MGMT启动子甲基化检测作为低级别弥漫性胶质瘤的常规检查。只推荐那些参加适当设计的临床试验的群体来做此类检测。

目标人群:组织学上确诊的WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤

问题:组织学上确诊的 成人(≥18岁的)WHO2级弥漫性胶质瘤Ki-67/MIB1免疫组化检测是否必须?如果是,哪种方法最合适?

建议:Ki67/MIB1免疫组化检查在用来评价预后方面是值得推荐的(LEVEL III)。

JNeurooncol. 2015 Dec;125(3):531-49. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-1909-8. Epub 2015Nov 3.

Therole of neuropathology in the management of patients with diffuse low gradeglioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

CahillDP1, Sloan AE2, Nahed BV3, Aldape KD4, Louis DN5, Ryken TC6, Kalkanis SN7,Olson JJ8.

Authorinformation

Abstract

TARGETPOPULATION:

Adultpatients (age ≥18 years) who have suspected low-grade diffuse glioma.

QUESTION:

Whatare the optimal neuropathological techniques to diagnose low-grade diffuseglioma in the adult?

RECOMMENDATION:

LEVELI: Histopathological analysis of a representative surgical sample of the lesionshould be used to provide the diagnosis of low-grade diffuse glioma.

LEVELIII:

Bothfrozen section and cytopathologic/smear evaluation should be used to aid theintra-operative assessment of low-grade diffuse glioma diagnosis. A resectionspecimen is preferred over a biopsy specimen, to minimize the potential forsampling error issues.

TARGETPOPULATION:

Patientswith histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma.

QUESTION:

Inadult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, istesting for IDH1 mutation (R132H and/or others) warranted? If so, is there apreferred method?

RECOMMENDATION:

LEVELII:

IDHgene mutation assessment, via IDH1 R132H antibody and/or IDH1/2 mutationhotspot sequencing, is highly-specific for low-grade diffuse glioma, and isrecommended as an additional test for classification and prognosis.

TARGETPOPULATION:

Patientswith histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma.

QUESTION:

Inadult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, istesting for 1p/19q loss warranted? If so, is there a preferred method?

RECOMMENDATION:

LEVELIII:

1p/19qloss-of-heterozygosity testing, by FISH, array-CGH or PCR, is recommended as anadditional test in oligodendroglial cases for prognosis and potential treatmentplanning.

TARGETPOPULATION:

Patientswith histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma.

QUESTION:

Inadult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, isMGMT promoter methylation testing warranted? If so, is there a preferredmethod?

RECOMMENDATION:

Thereis insufficient evidence to recommend methyl-guanine methyl-transferase (MGMT)promoter methylation testing as a routine for low-grade diffuse gliomas. It isrecommended that patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials toassess the value of this and related markers for this target population.

TARGETPOPULATION:

Patientswith histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma.

QUESTION:

Inadult patients (age ≥18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, isKi-67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry warranted? If so, is there a preferred methodto quantitate results?

RECOMMENDATION:

LEVELIII:

Ki67/MIB1immunohistochemistry is recommended as an option for prognostic assessment.

本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
【文献快递】《2021年WHO中枢神经系统肿瘤分类》的主要特点
第243课 (中枢神经)病例探析(066)—大脑胶质瘤病
早读:成人常见弥漫性胶质瘤分类的简化
一文献一技术路线:如何链接常规Biomarker和临床影像学
低级别胶质瘤的治疗治疗指南 2016版和2015版对比
美国:低级别胶质瘤首次化疗的 8个问题
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服