打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
【猪】第六十六期:热应激会影响猪对日粮脂肪的利用吗?

2016. J. Anim. Sci. 94(11): 4688-4703

热应激会影响猪对日粮脂肪的利用吗?

T. A. Kellner, L. H. Baumgard, K. J. Prusa,N. K. GablerJ. F. Patience

    热应激降低猪只生产性能,也可能会降低胴体脂肪品质,从而给生猪产业带来巨大损失。

    本试验旨在检测35天育肥期内热应激如何影响猪只对日粮脂肪(如脂肪消化率、代谢和沉积)的利用。试验选取96PIC 337 × C22/C29PIC, Inc., Hendersonville, TN)阉公猪(初重100.4± 1.2 kg)按3 × 3 析因设计随机分到9个处理,温度环境设置为三种,分别为:对照组(TN;稳定为24°C;自由采食)、限制采食组(PFTN;稳定为24°C;限制采食量与热应激组相同)、热应激组(夜间温度一直控制为28°C 、白天温度依次为试验开始至第7天为33°C、第7天至第14天为33.5°C、第14天至第21天为34°C,第21天至第28天为34.5°C、第28天至第35天为35°C;自由采食);日粮设置为三种,分别为(脂肪添加量为0%的玉米-豆粕型基础日粮CNTR)、基础日粮中添加有3%牛油[TAL;碘价{IV} = 41.8]、基础日粮中添加3%玉米油[CO; 碘价IV = 123.0]

    对任何主要的指标来说,饲养环境和日粮间均无交互影响(P 0.063)。热应激导致直肠温度的增加(HS组是39.0°CTN组为38.1°C PFTN组为38.2°CP <>)。热应激降低了日均采食量ADFI 27.8%; P <>)、平均日增重ADG (热应激组0.72 kg/d , 对照组1.03 kg/d 、限制采食组0.78 kg/d P <>)和肉料比G:F(热应激组0.290、对照组组0.30、限制采食组0.319P = 0.006)。热应激组阉公猪相较限制采食组来说每公斤体重需多摄入1.2 Mcal 代谢能(P <>)。热应激组猪只酸水解脂肪(AEE)的全肠道表观消化率(ATTD)相较其他组是最低的(热应激组为59.0% 对照组60.2%、限制采食组61.4%P = 0.055)。玉米油组(99.3%)酸水解脂肪的全肠道真消化率(TTTD)比0%脂肪组(97.3%)和牛油组(96.3%)的要高(P = 0.012)。上市后猪颊肉的碘值随着日粮脂肪不饱和度的增加而增加(对照组为68.5 g/100 g 牛油组为68.2 g/100 g 、玉米油组为71.5 g/100 g P <>)。热应激降低了 ATGLHSL两个基因的mRNA丰度(P 0.041)。热应激和玉米油使得SCD基因的mRNA丰度增加(P 0.047),且玉米油增加了FASN基因的mRNA丰度(P = 0.011)。

    综上所述,热应激并没有改变猪只对日粮脂肪的利用。然而,热应激导致平均日增重、日均采食量、肉料比、热效率的降低以及脂肪分解通路相关基因mRNA丰度的下降,从而导致热应激组猪比限制采食组猪更肥的现象。

 

Does heat stress alter the pig’s response to dietary fat?

T. A. Kellner, L. H. Baumgard, K. J. Prusa,N. K. Gabler and J. F. Patience

Heat stress (HS) results in major losses to the pork industry via reduced growth performance and, possibly, carcass fat quality. The experimental objective was to measure the effects of HS on the pig’s response to dietary fat in terms of lipid digestion, metabolism, and deposition over a 35-d finishing period. A total of 96 PIC 337 × C22/C29 (PIC, Inc., Hendersonville, TN) barrows (initial BW of 100.4 ± 1.2 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 9 treatments arranged as a 3 × 3 factorial: thermoneutral (TN; constant 24°C; ad libitum access to feed), pair-fed thermoneutral (PFTN; constant 24°C; limit fed based on previous HS daily feed intake), or HS (cyclical 28°C night time, 33°C from d 0 to 7, 33.5°C from d 7 to 14, 34°C from d 14 to 21, 34.5°C from d 21 to 28, and 35°C from d 28 to 35 day time; ablibitum access to feed) and diet (a corn–soybean meal–based diet with 0% added fat [CNTR], CNTR with 3% added tallow [TAL; iodine value {IV} = 41.8], or CNTR with 3% added corn oil [CO; IV = 123.0]). No interactions between environment and diet were evident for any major response criteria (P 0.063). Rectal temperature increased due to HS (39.0°C for HS, 38.1°C for TN, and 38.2°C for PFTN; P < 0.001).="" heat="" stress="" decreased="" adfi="" (27.8%;="" p=""><0.001), adg="" (0.72="" kg/d="" for="" hs,="" 1.03="" kg/d="" for="" tn,="" and="" 0.78="" kg/d="" for="" pftn;="" p=""><0.001), and="" g:f="" (0.290="" for="" hs,="" 0.301="" for="" tn,="" and="" 0.319="" for="" pftn;="" p="0.006).Heat" stress="" barrows="" required="" 1.2="" mcal="" of="" me="" intake="" more="" per="" kilogram="" of="" bw="" gain="" than="" pftn="" (p="">< 0.001).="" heat="" stress="" tended="" to="" result="" in="" the="" lowest="" apparent="" total="" tract="" digestibility="" of="" acid="" hydrolyzed="" ether="" extract="" (aee;="" 59.0%="" for="" hs,="" 60.2%="" for="" tn,="" and="" 61.4%="" for="" pftn;="" p="0.055)." true="" total="" tract="" digestibility(tttd)="" of="" aee="" of="" co-based="" diets="" (99.3%)="" was="" greater="" than="" that="" of="" cntr="" (97.3%)="" and="" tal-based="" diets="" (96.3%;="" p="0.012)." environment="" had="" no="" impact="" on="" tttd="" of="" aee="" (p="0.118)." environment="" had="" no="" impact="" on="" jowl="" iv="" at="" market="" (69.2="" g/100="" g="" for="" hs,="" 69.3="" g/100="" g="" for="" tn,="" and="" 69.8="" g/100="" g="" for="" pftn;="" p="0.624)." jowl="" iv="" at="" market="" increased="" with="" increasing="" degree="" of="" unsaturation="" of="" the="" dietary="" fat="" (68.5="" g/100="" g="" for="" cntr,="" 68.2="" g/100="" g="" for="" tal,="" and="" 71.5="" g/100="" g="" for="" co;="" p=""><0.001). heat="" stress="" decreased="" mrna="" abundance="" of="" atgl="" and="" hsl="" (p=""> 0.041).Heat stress and CO increased mRNA abundance of SCD (P 0.047), and CO increased abundance of FASN (P = 0.011). In conclusion, HS does not alter the pigs response to dietary fat. However, HS leads to reduced ADG, ADFI, G:F, and caloric efficiency and a suppression of mRNA abundance of genes involved in the lipolytic cascade, which resulted in a phenotype that was fatter than PFTN.


本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
【热】打开小程序,算一算2024你的财运
[热应激专题]热应激和营养水平对生长猪代谢的影响
组蛋白修饰迈入单细胞测序时代 | 单细胞专题
发酵饲料桑粉对育肥猪生长性能和猪肉品质的影响
欢迎光临常德农经网
科学家:1公斤饲料加150毫克铜,猪长得又快又重
黄连素和牛磺酸对胰岛素抵抗大鼠脂肪组织PAIlmRNA表达的影响
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服