考研参考书、报录比、院校解析
院校名称
报录比
推荐参考用书
备注
中国政法
★★★
1:7
1-《英汉翻译简明教程》，庄绎传编，北京：外语教学与研究出版社，2002。
2-《高级英汉翻译理论与实践》，叶子南编，北京：清华大学出版社，2001。
3-《英译中国现代散文选》，张培基编，上海：上海外语教育出版社，1999。
4-《实用汉语语法与修辞》，杨月蓉编，重庆：西南师范大学出版社，1999。
5-《中国文化读本》，叶朗编，北京：外语教学与研究出版社，2008。
6-《应用文写作》，夏晓鸣编，上海复旦大学出版社，2010
7-《翻译硕士英语真题解析》天津科技翻译出版社
8-《汉语写作与百科知识真题解析》天津科技翻译出版社
9-《汉语写作与百科知识》天津科技翻译出版社
★16年分数线350分
★招收人数：19人
★学费每年4万
★复试科目为：综合英语笔试命题范围为：听力、笔译、作文。
★复试内容及比重：专业课笔试（40%）、专业课口试（40%）、外国语听力及口语（20%）。初试、复试成绩权重：拟录取总成绩为百分制，初试、复试成绩各占50%。复试比例1:1.3
2016年2015年分数线、招生人数、推免人数
中国政法大学
（英语笔译）
2016年
2015年
备注
分数线
350分
345分
1、学费每年4万
2、初试复试成绩各占一半
3、复试为综合英语笔试：听力、笔译、作文
4、复试比例为1:1.3
招生人数
19人
15人（推8）
考研真题：
考试科目：357英语翻译基础
一．词汇互译
1.UNSC
2.CV
3.CCPIT
4.PPP
5.Boao Forum for Asia
6.habeas corpus
7.legal representative
8.precedential value
9.Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic works
10.司法为民
11.儒家文化
12.万众创新
13.中小微企业
二．英译汉
Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments. Compulsory school attendance laws and the great expenditures for education both demonstrate our recognition of the importance of education in our democratic society. It is required in the performance of our most basic public responsibilities, even service in the armed forces. It is the very foundation of good citizenship. Today it is a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values, in preparing him for later professional training, and in helping him to adjust normally to his environment. In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.
Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the negro group. A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn. Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racial[ly] integrated school system.
We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
本站仅提供存储服务，所有内容均由用户发布，如发现有害或侵权内容，请
点击举报。
