牛津大学的导师制一文尾注

附上尾注，也许有的读者会感兴趣。

---

[1] 《围城》，钱锺书著，人民文学出版社1997年版，第225页。

 

[2] Will G. MooreThe Tutorial System and Its Future， Oxford: Pregamon Press, 1968，p. 571 in C. E. Mallet, A History of the University of Oxford： Modern Oxford, London: Methuen, 1927，iii.

[3] Will G. Moore, The Tutorial System and Its Future， Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968, p.2.

 

[4] James Clark,“The Oxford Tutorial from the Students’ Perspective” in The Oxford Tutorial, ed. David Palfreyman, Blackwell’s, 2001, pp. 105-109.

[5] Michael Ignatieff, Isaiah Berlin: a Life, New York: Metropolitan Books, 1998，pp. 171-172。

[6] Edmund Ronald Leach, Claude Lévi-Strauss, New York: Viking Press, 1974.

[7] Bronislaw Malinowski,The Ethnography of Malinowski: the Trobriand Island, 1915-18, ed. Michael W. Young, London and Boston: RKP， 1979. 。Structure and Function in Primitive Society: Essays and Addresses, New York: Free Press, 1965; The Method of Ethnology and Social Anthropology, Marshalltown: South African Association for the Advancement of Science, 1923.

 

[8] The Social Anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown）, Adam Kuper, London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul, 1977.

 

[9] 阿伦博士给我出的题的原文为“In what ways does Mauss’s essay enable us to understand the Trobriand data （马林诺夫斯基田野考察的资料）better?”。

 

[10] 《话牛津》收入《林语堂文集》，林语堂著，第九卷－散文，北京：作家出版社，1995年，第343页。

[11] 《吸烟与文化》，编入《巴黎的麟爪》，徐志摩著，中国文联出版公司，1993年，第21页。林语堂，《说牛津》，第342－347页。收入《林语堂文集》，第九卷：散文。北京：作家出版社，1995年。最早读到这一说法的是在陈平原的《中国大学十讲》，复旦大学出版社，第206页，2002年。斯蒂芬·里亚科可（Stephen Leacock）的短文而闻名于世，My Discovery of England），Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1961，pp.89-90.原文如下：“I understand that the key to this mystery is found in the operations of the person called the tutor.  It is from him, or rather with him, that the students learn all that they know: one and all are agreed on that.  Yet it is a little odd to know just how he does it.  ‘We go over to his rooms,’ said one student, ‘and he just lights a pipe and talks to us.’ ‘We sit round wit h him,” said another, “and he simply smokes and goes over our exercises with us.’ 北京大学中文系陈平原教授提供徐志摩写的有关牛津大学导师制的原文的出处。笔者在此深表谢意。

[12] 1990年，在牛津，通常一个系科依然只聘一位教授。现在，和其他体制一样，牛津的教授制度也在往美国式的体制更改。

[13] 《阶序人：印度的种姓制度以及涵义》，路易斯·杜蒙著（Louis Dumont, Homo Hierarchicus: the Case System and Its Implication, the University of Chicago Press,）1980年版。译自法文Original French edition, Homo hierarchicus: Le système des castes et ses implications，1Paris: Gallimard，1979。

 

[14] Stephen Leacock， My Discovery of England，Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1961，pp.88-89.原文如下：“With us the lectures form a real part of the college life.  At Oxford it is not so….But they are quite worthless and are not supposed to have anything to do with the development of the student’s mind.  They don’t matter: that you can take them if you like; they do you no harm.”

[15] 《钱锺书散文》，钱锺书著，杭州：浙江文艺出版社，1997年版，第73至74页。

 

[16] 《他鄉：以撒·柏林传》，汉文版第95页，英文版，第63至64页。第63页提到：“All Soul built it walls high than outsiders; once inside, it treated fellows as equals.” 其实，任何一个俱乐部，社团和经过层层筛选才能加入的组织都是这样。“His rooms were soon a place of resort: the Rhodes Scholar from Germany, Adam von Trott, dropped by to borrow gramophone records and talk about Hegel; the English scholar Humprey House discussed literature and came away thinking that Isaiah knew less about Worthwroth, Dickens and the English tradition than he should have done.  Maurice Bowra visited and bellowed cheerfully. Goronwy Rees, now a young journalist in London, would return at weekends, with gossip of politics and his love life. ”。第65页