By Clifford A. Kiracofe (
Global Times) 08:31, September 12, 2013
Email|
Print|
Comments twitter facebook Sina Microblog reddit Although US President Barack Obama said Tuesday that diplomatic options suggested byRussia to solve the Syrian chemical weapon crisis would be pursued, the damage done bythe US beating the drums of war has already been done.
The use of propaganda in wartime is nothing new. From experience with Washington's liesduring former president George W. Bush's Iraq War, the international community knowsthe US cannot be trusted.
The Bush administration knowingly and systematically circulated false stories aboutweapons of mass destruction (WMDs) allegedly possessed by Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Washington's outrageous claims such as supposed uranium "yellowcake" from Niger beingtransferred to Iraq proved false. Claims about "aluminum tubes" for rocket productionproved false. Claims about chemical warfare and WMDs raised by then secretary of stateColin Powell at the UN proved false.
The broader pattern of Western deception for the Iraq War included falsified "intelligence"reports from the UK ordered by then prime minister Tony Blair. Parliament in itssubsequent investigations of the "dodgy dossier" intelligence manipulation revealed Blair'slies.
Investigations of the British claims revealed that Israeli institutions, including the Herzliyaresearch complex, played an important role in creating these false British and US reports.
Today in the case of Syria, the world is experiencing the same spectacle of US, British, andIsraeli propaganda and deception. The players remain the same and the pattern of lies anddeception is the same.
In the present case, the White House bases its case of the Syrian use of WMDs primarily ona single "intercept" of an unencrypted Syrian military voice communication. Washingtonalleges that this intercept proves the Syrian military used WMDs against civilians.
But what are the facts? Official Washington carefully avoids identifying the source of theintercept and hides it under the rubric of classified information because, critics say, thesource of this intelligence report is Israel.
Experienced retired US intelligence officers believe that Israel is once again playing falsewith information so as to influence the West to go to war in the Middle East. Reports saythat the alleged electronic intercept of a conversation between Syrian military personnelwas fielded by Unit 8200 of Israeli military intelligence, which specializes in signalsintelligence.
Some US experts believe that this alleged intercept, if it even exists, was doctored by theIsraeli government so as to "prove" Syrian government complicity in WMD attacks.
Former British ambassador Craig Murray raises additional questions about the Israelireport.
He claims that the powerful British electronic intelligence center for the region, located onMount Troodos in Cyprus, has no such intercept from its own monitoring.
He says that this center has such powerful capabilities that no electronic communications inthe Middle East can escape it.
In addition to the Israeli allegation, the White House says it has obtained materials fromthe scene of the recent attack in Syria which "prove" the nerve agent Sarin was used.
From whom did the US obtain such contaminated materials? The Obama administrationrefuses to identify the source and chain of custody of the materials.
Given Washington's transparent propaganda campaign, it is not surprising that someleaders around the world express grave doubts about US allegations. Russian PresidentVladimir Putin forthrightly calls such propaganda "lies." Many Americans, includingsenators and congresspersons, would agree with him.
It is significant that the US Intelligence Community (IC) so far is not on public recordsupporting the Israeli allegations. The US IC apparently cannot assess with high confidencethis Israeli reporting.
This is why the Obama administration had to issue its own politicized report on allegedSyrian WMD use from the White House.
The White House made a major political mistake engaging in such blatant deception of theAmerican people and the international community.
The recent turnabout may mean no strikes, but the harm to US credibility has alreadybeen done.
The author is an educator and former senior professional staff member of the SenateCommittee on Foreign Relations. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
（Editor：LiangJun、Zhang Qian）
Related reading
Commentary: Obama's turn on Syria reflects changing timesObama says to work with Russia, partners on Syria chemical weaponsObama asks Congress to delay Syria voteObama asks Congress to delay Syria voteU.S. Senate delays test vote on Syria amid positive signs of int'l diplomacyObama's national security adviser pushes for strike on SyriaObama intensifies PR campaign on Syria with interviews, speechesObama says U.S. cannot turn blind eye to Syria crisisWe RecommendDPRK holds military parade to mark 65th founding anniv.Highlights of MAKS 2013 Int'l Aviation and Space Show10th China-ASEAN Expo opens in NanningEagle Boy takes to sky to break another record12-year-old boy becomes pillar of the familyEye-gouged boy receives blind rehabilitation in ShanxiTop 10 naked hotels in the worldThe most gorgeous Chinese women in the eyes of foreignersA collection of bizarre rooftop buildings around ChinaName:
