打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
SCI统计方法写作秘籍【1065】
缘起

一些人困惑SCI论文里Statistical analysis部分如何撰写,这就问对人了,松哥告诉你最最简单的4词8字撰写法,开始喽!

1.软件

数据分析所使用的软件及其版本、所属公司、公司所属地等信息。请注意后面SAS、R、SPSS、Graphpad、Matlab等的写法,松哥都给你搜集好了。

例如:Thedata were analysed by SPSS version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,USA).

2.描述

数据结果的呈现和描述形式。

例如:Continuousvariables with normal distribution were presents as mean±standarddeviation (SD); non-normal variables were reported as median (interquartilerange).

3.检验

数据分析的统计检验方法。该部分写作要尽可能的详尽。

例如:Meanof two continuous normally distributed variables were compared by independentsamples Student's test.

4.水准

设定的假设检验水准。

例如:Avalue of P<0.05 was considered significant.

Statistical analysis(sample 1)

(每种颜色代表上面的一个词)

Thedatawere … analysed by SPSS version 11.5 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).Thenormality of distribution of continuous variables was tested by one-sampleKolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables with normal distribution werepresentedas mean (standard deviation [SD]); non-normal variables were reported as median(interquartile range [IQR]). Means of 2 continuous normally distributed variables were comparedby independent samples Student’s t test. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallistest were used, respectively, to compare means of 2 and 3 or more groups ofvariables not normally distributed. The frequencies of categorical variableswere compared using Pearson χ2 or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate.A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.” 

Statistical analysis(sample 2)

(每种颜色代表上面的一个词)

Thestatisticalanalysis was performed by MATLAB statistical toolbox version2008 (MathWorks,Natick, MA, USA)for Windowsat 32 bit. Dataare presented as number and percentages for categorical variables, and continuous datawere expressedas mean ± standard deviation (SD), unless otherwise specified.Inter-group difference was compared using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categoricalvariables andone-way ANOVA test for continuous variables. The logrank test was used to compare Kaplan–Meier survival curves. The pre-therapy data were used as thebaseline andcompared with post-therapy data by ANOVA test forrepeated measures. Only if ANOVA test was significant, the pvalue for pairwise comparisons was computed with tStudent test with Bonferroni correction. We consideredsignificant allstatistical tests with p value<0.05. Finally, we had denoted with T0 = pre-therapy control point, T1 = 6 months of therapy, T2 = 12 months oftherapy.

Statistical analysis(sample 3)

(每种颜色代表上面的一个词)

Dataareexpressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). For parametric data, comparisonof different groups was performed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’spost hoc test for multiple comparisons. Survival rate was plotted usingKaplan−Meier method and analyzed using Log-rank test.Statisticalanalysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).<0.05 was considered statistically significant. 

Statistical analysis(sample 4)

(每种颜色代表上面的一个词)

Statisticalanalyseswere performed using GraphPad Prism 6 Software (GraphPadSoftware,Inc.,SanDiego,CA), MedCalcsoftware (MedCalcSoftware, Ostend, Belgium) and R (R Foundation forStatistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Mann-Whitney U test andFisher’s exacttest were performed to evaluate the patient characteristics between: RAS andBOS,and RAS and No-CLAD. The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to investigate thestatistical significancefor inward and outward deformation vectors between: RAS and BOS,andRASand No-CLAD. The Wilcoxon-signed rank test was used for comparing the upperandlowersections. Logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation were performed toevaluate whetherthe results from deformation analysis alone could categorize the patientsinto RAS,BOS or No-CLAD independently from the PFT/TLC results. Ap-value <0.05 was considered to indicate significant differences in median data values.

统计思维与统计理论系列[1]

点击即可阅读哦!

【1064】这篇SCI论文10个统计问题辨析

【1063】以前认为概念无所谓,松哥错了

【1062】松哥,我发现一处SCI统计错误,非常荒谬!

【1061】分类变量哑变量设置后,参照到底如何选择?

【1060】松哥,这篇SCI的诊断试验结果看不懂,他到底是咋比的

【1059】如何向统计老师咨询统计问题的正确姿势

【1058】生存分析单因素筛选的困惑

【1057】4种最常用的统计设计解读

【1056】SPSS统计软件学习终身不忘之必杀技

【1055】回归家族的书剑恩仇录,高手进阶必经之路

【1054】单因素是危险因素,多因素却保护因素了,想逆天吗?

【1053】这种文章统计套路您一定要学,不管你什么专业通杀

【1052】这个空白对照到底要不要加?

【1051】同一肝癌患者,同时接受CT、超声和磁共振,如何分析?

【1050】来自临床真实问题,有点意思,松哥荐读!

【1049】知道两组数据的样本量均数标准差,怎么算合并效应量呢?

【1048】P>0.05,本身就是没意义还是样本量不够?

【1047】昨天之后,偏埃塔方的界值标准

【1046】两因素方差分析,如何判断哪个因素对结果影响较大?

【1045】带基线数据数值变量如何进行统计分析辨析

【1044】统计学习之最大困惑!!

【1043】统计书没有告诉你的统计规律,你发现了没?

【1042】这两个是啥图,区别和联系

【1041】变量之间到底是单项转化还是双向转化

【1040】统计水平自我评估表

【1039】基线分析的3个终极目的

【1038】统计小白的学习路径

【1037】SCI论文中Logistic回归模型“门当户对”原则,松哥心得推荐给您

【1036】被我们忽视的生存分析区间删失数据

【1035】Logistic回归文章的SCI审稿人意见解读

【1034】统计学上的2K效应,你发现了没?

【1033】正态分布的3个基因密码,聆听大自然心跳的代码!

【1032】生存分析K-M法与COX回归结论不一致怎么办?

【1031】异常值的处理只有删除?

【1030】没有比较就没有伤害,让咱们互相伤害吧,教你4大类统计伤害方法

【1029】SCI审稿人让我控制2个单因素无意义的变量?

【1028】量表评价是信度重要还是效度重要?

【1027】Meta分析要解决的首要任务

【1026】文章材料与方法中统计方法如何描述

【1025】聚类分析稳定性判别的经验总结

【1023】“参数检验与非参数检验”哪个更好?

【1022】聚类分析只需这1张图就够了!

【1021】干预前后数据统计分析方法

【1020】听完四个小故事,你就明白主成分分析是啥意思了!

【1019】方差分析P>0.05,两两比较LSD法P<0.05,这可咋整?

【1018】倾向性评分后数据,应该采用配对设计还是成组设计?

【1017】双重差分模型,何方神圣?

【1016】等级与等比,可得分清楚!

【1015】频率与概率,如胶又似漆!

【1014】终于发现不用学习,顿悟统计的方法

【1013】加权最小二乘回归是什么鬼?

【1012】统计世界的4维空间

【1011】平行性检验到底应该啥时候做?

【1010】这篇文章凭啥这样分组呢?

【1009】常用统计分析方法选择图解

【1008】啥!统计也会犯错,还分犯I类和II类错误?

【1007】统计必学的4个核心思想

【1006】别说相关太简单,且听松哥说相关

【1005】统计方法与统计思想谁重要?

【1004】正态分布10种鉴别方法汇总【荐藏】

【1003】连续变量变成等级变量后,原来有意义的变量变得没意义了?

【1002】别人让我出了5道选择题,顺便你也测测!

【1001】SCI论文中的P for trend是什么鬼?为什么高分文章经常采用呢

本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
GraphPad Prism不仅能作图,统计也是杠杠的!
Graphpad prism绘制柱状图-3组及以上数据
如何对比多个机器学习算法【转自微博分享】
ANOVA
首次揭秘 | 最强SCI论文利器合集,快狠准实现高分SCI发表!
(8.15) 如何制作符合SCI要求的插图?内附GraphPad SPSS AI PS PPT(软件...
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服