Guideline contributor: Kathy D Miller, MD Professor of Medicine and Ballve-Lantero Scholar, Indiana University School of Medicine; Co-Leader, Breast Cancer Program, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Guidelines on breast cancer screening have been issued by the following organizations:
The guidelines differ in their recommendations regarding breast self-examination and clinical breast examination, use of screening mammography in women 40-49 years old, age at which to discontinue screening mammography, and MRI mammography. All three guidelines recommend routine screening mammography in asymptomatic, average-risk women aged 50 to 74, but differ with regard to frequency of screening.
The ACS updated its guidelines for breast cancer screening in average-risk women in October 2015. [161] At this time, the ACS is in the process of updating the breast cancer screening guidelines for women at high risk, which were last updated in 2007. [162]
Breast examination
It is acceptable for women to choose not to do breast self-examination (BSE) or to do BSE regularly (monthly) or irregularly. Beginning in their early 20s, women should be told about the benefits and limitations of BSE. Whether a woman ever performs BSE, the importance of prompt reporting of any new breast symptoms to a health professional should be emphasized. Women who choose to do BSE should receive instruction and have their technique reviewed on the occasion of a periodic health examination
The ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination for breast cancer screening in average-risk women at any age
Mammography
ACS recommendations are as follows [161] :
Breast MRI Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography
The ACS recommends annual MRI screening along with mammography, based on evidence from nonrandomized screening trials and observational studies, in women with the following risk factors [163] :
The ACS recommends annual MRI screening, based on expert consensus opinion that considers evidence of lifetime risk for breast cancer, in women with the following risk factors [163] :
The ACS found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against MRI screening in women with the following risk factors [163] :
The ACS recommends against MRI screening (based on expert consensus opinion) in women at <15% lifetime risk.
Finally, the ACS advises that screening decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, as there may be particular factors to support MRI. Payment should not be a barrier.
In 2016, the USPSTF released updated recommendations on breast cancer screening, but did not update its 2009 recommendations for breast examination. In its 2016 statement, the USPSTF encouraged patients to be aware of changes in their bodies and discussing these changes with clinicians. [164]
The 2009 breast examination recommendations are as follows [93] :
The 2016 screening mammography recommendations are as follows [164] :
BCRA-related cancer
In 2013, the USPSTF issued updated guidelines on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women. The current USPSTF recommendations are as follows [165] :
The ACOG released guidelines for breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women in 2017. [166] For women at average risk, ACOG categorizes its recommendations as follows:
ACOG recommends that health care providers periodically assess patients' breast cancer risk by reviewing the history (level B). Breast cancer risk factors include the following:
Women whose initial history indicates a potentially increased risk of breast cancer should have further risk assessment (level B), using the Gail model or another of the validated assessment tools available online, such as the BRCAPRO, Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm, International Breast Cancer Intervention Studies (IBIS, also known as Tyrer–Cuzick), or the Claus model.
Breast examination
Women should be counseled about breast self-awareness (ie, awareness of the normal appearance and feel of their breasts) and encouraged to notify their health care provider if they experience a change (level C). However, breast self-examination is not recommended (level B).
Clinical breast examination remains a recommended part of the evaluation of women who are at high risk or have symptoms. Screening clinical breast examination may be offered to asymptomatic, average-risk women on the following schedules, in the context of an informed, shared decision-making approach that recognizes the uncertainty of its benefits and the possibility of adverse consequences (level C):
Mammography
The decision about the age to begin mammography screening should be made through a shared decision-making process that includes information about the potential benefits and harms. Recommendations (level A) for average-risk women are as follows:
ACOG considers that age alone should not be the basis to continue or discontinue screening. Beyond age 75 years, the decision to discontinue screening mammography should be based on a shared decision-making process informed by the woman’s health status and longevity (level C).
Guidelines for pharmacologic intervention in women who are at increased risk for breast cancer, but do not have a personal history of breast cancer, have been issued by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) [167] and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). [168] The guidelines differ in their classification of increased risk and in their inclusion of women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).
ASCO has updated its practice guidelines regarding pharmacologic intervention (eg, tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibitors) for breast cancer risk reduction. [167]
ASCO guidelines recommend the following [167] :
ASCO guidelines recommend that discussions with patients and health care providers should include both the risks and benefits of pharmacologic breast cancer risk reduction in the preventive setting.
Tamoxifen
ASCO guidelines recommend that use of tamoxifen, 20 mg per day orally for 5 years, should be discussed as an option to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer (BC), specifically ER-positive BC, in women 35 years of age or older who are premenopausal or postmenopausal and have a 5-year projected absolute breast cancer risk ≥ 1.66% or with LCIS. Risk reduction benefit continues for at least 10 years. [167]
ASCO guidelines advise that tamoxifen not be used in the following cases [167] :
Raloxifene
ASCO guidelines recommend that raloxifene should be discussed as an option to reduce the risk of invasive BC, specifically ER-positive BC, in postmenopausal women who are age ≥ 35 years with a 5-year projected absolute BC risk ≥ 1.66% or with LCIS. Raloxifene is given in a dosage of 60 mg/ day orally for 5 years; it can be used for longer than 5 years in women with osteoporosis, in whom BC risk reduction is a secondary benefit. [167]
ASCO guidelines advise that raloxifene not be used in the following cases [167] :
Exemestane
Exemestane is not FDA approved for breast cancer risk reduction. However, ASCO guidelines recommend that it should be discussed as an alternative to tamoxifen and/or raloxifene to reduce the risk of invasive BC, specifically ER-positive BC, in postmenopausal women age ≥ 35 years with a 5-year projected absolute BC risk ≥ 1.66% or with LCIS or atypical hyperplasia. It should not be used for BC risk reduction in premenopausal women. Exemestane is given in a dosage of 25 mg per day orally for 5 years. [167]
The USPSTF updated its guidelines for primary breast cancer risk reduction in 2013. [168] The USPSTF recommends that clinicians engage in shared, informed decision making with women who are at increased risk for breast cancer about medications to reduce their risk. For women who are at increased risk for breast cancer and at low risk for adverse medication effects, clinicians should offer to prescribe risk-reducing medications, such as tamoxifen or raloxifene.
The USPSTF concluded that women with an estimated 5-year risk of 3% or greater are, on the basis of model estimates (specifically, the Freedman risk-benefit tables for women aged 50 years or older), more likely to benefit from tamoxifen or raloxifene. [168]
Guidelines for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) have been issued by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).
A 2014 update on SLNB for patients with early-stage breast cancer by ASCO advises that SLNB may be offered to the following patients [169] :
According to the ASCO guidelines, SLNB should not be performed in patients with any of the following:
ASCO recommendations regarding ALND in patients who have undergone SLNB are as follows:
The 2017 NCCN guidelines recommend that SLNB should be performed and is the preferred method of axillary lymph node staging if the patient is an appropriate candidate for SLNB. [72] Candidates include patients with clinical stage I, IIA, IIB, and IIIA T3, N1, M0 who are clinically node negative at the time of diagnosis, as well as those who are clinically node positive but have negative results on fine needle aspiration or core biopsy.
The NCCN recommends axillary dissection level I/II if the sentinel node is not identified or if the sentinel node is positive but the patient fails to meet all the following criteria:
If the patient does meet all those criteria, the NCCN recommends against further axillary surgery. In addition, no further axillary surgery is a category 1 recommendation for patients with a negative sentinal lymph node. The NCCN guidelines state that lymph node dissection is optional in the following cases:
Finally, for patients with clinically negative axillae who are undergoing mastectomy and for whom radiation therapy is planned, the NCCN states that axillary radiation may replace axillary dissection level I/II for regional control of disease.
In contrast with ASCO, the NCCN concluded that insufficient data exist on which to base recommendations regarding the use of SLNB in pregnant women. The NCCN advises that whether to use SLNB in pregnancy should be an individualized decision, but cites a review recommending that SLNB should not be offered to pregnant women under 30 weeks' gestation. If SLNB is used, the NCCN advises that isosulfan blue or methylene blue dye is contraindicated for SLNB in pregnancy, but radiolabeled sulfur colloid appears to be safe. [72]
In 2016, the Society of Surgical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology released a consensus guideline that addresses margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Key recommendations include [170] :
The following consensus guideline, released in 2014 by the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society for Radiation Oncology, addresses margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. [171] :
According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, mastectomy with level I/II axillary lymph node dissection is the recommended procedure in patients who respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Other NCCN indications for mastectomy include the following [72] :
Relative indications for mastectomy include the following:
Patients who are younger than 35 years of age or premenopausal with known BRCA1/2 mutations have an increased risk of local recurrence. Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy may be considered for risk reduction.
Clinical practice guidelines developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), recommend that postmastectomy radiation therapy be performed according to the following criteria [172] :
Patients with more than four positive lymph nodes should also undergo prophylactic nodal radiation therapy at doses of 45-50 Gy to the axillary and supraclavicular regions. For patients in whom ALND shows no node involvement, axillary radiation therapy is not recommended.
Evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for treatment of HER2 -positive breast cancer, which are largely adapted from the 2015 Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) clinical practice guidelines, are as follows [173, 174, 175] :
In 2016, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) issued an updated clinical practice guideline on adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. ASCO recommends high-risk women receive adjuvant endocrine therapy with ovarian suppression but lower-risk patients should not. [176]
Specific recommendations include [176] :
In its 2014 practice guidelines, ASCO addressed postmenopausal women and recommended they be offered adjuvant endocrine therapy with one of the following treatments [177, 178] :
Postmenopausal patients should be offered adjuvant endocrine therapy with one of the following treatments [177, 178] :
Postmenopausal patients who are intolerant of either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor should be offered an alternative adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients who have received an aromatase inhibitor but discontinued treatment at less than 5 years may be offered tamoxifen for a total of 5 years. Patients who have received tamoxifen for 2-3 years should be offered an aromatase inhibitor for up to 5 years, for a total duration of up to 7-8 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. [177, 178]
Guidelines on the management of breast cancer in young women from the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncologists (ESMO), and endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA), include 75 statements. [179] Among them are the following recommendations:
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) [72] and the American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ACS/ASCO) [180] have issued guidelines on followup care for breast cancer survivors. The guidelines differ principally in the timing of care. See the table below.
Table Follow-up Recommendations for Breast Cancer Survivors (Open Table in a new window)
NCCN | ACS/ASCO | |
History and physical examination | Year 1, every 3-4 mo Year 2, every 4 mo Year 3-5, every 6 mo Year 6 , annually | Year 1-3, every 3-6 mo Year 4-5, every 6-12 mo Year 6 , annually |
Signs of recurrance | No recommendation | Educated and counseled about signs and symptoms |
Mammography | 6 mo after post-BCS radiation therapy Annually thereafter | Annually |
MRI | No recommendation | Not recommended for routine screening unless patient meets high-risk criteria for increased surveillance |
Pelvic examination | Annually, for women on tamoxifen Annual exam if uterus present | No recommendation |
Routine blood tests | Not recommended | Not recommended |
Imaging studies | Not recommended | Not recommended |
Tumor marker testing | Not recommended | No recommendation |
A guideline from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) advises that the only biomarkers that can guide choices of specific treatment regimens in breast cancer are as follows [181] :
ASCO recommendations regarding further biomarker use include the following [181] :
联系客服