文章亮点
对我国WEEE再利用的政策和实践与欧盟进行了比较。
讨论了WEEE再利用的知识缺口和潜在的科学解决方案。
中国的再利用政策需要像欧盟国家那样更加系统化。
中国的再利用策略可以从组件再利用管理的推广入手。
在文献综述的基础上明确了再利用及其相关概念。
中文摘要
在废物层次中,再利用总是被认为优于材料和能源回收,这一概念也适用于废旧电器电子产品(WEEE)。然而,在实践中,再利用并不是常用的寿命终止选项。我们比较了中国和欧盟的WEEE再利用的政策和实践,这种比较有助于识别知识差距和再利用政策需求,以及实现方法。我们还通过分析利益相关者的关注点来讨论WEEE再利用的潜在科学解决方案。我们发现,虽然中国已经有了与再利用相关的指导方针和标准,但是这些政策需要像欧盟一样更加系统化,更加适应中国的具体挑战。我们提出了再利用的政策建议,以促进WEEE的可持续管理,包括将再利用策略整合到当前的管理政策中以及促进组件的再利用。此外,我们还发现需要更多关于驱动因素和再利用障碍的研究,以支持更有效和高效的管理。
图1.使用的WEEE的一般材料流程和各个点的潜在政策实施
图2.再利用的影响因素
原文信息
英文摘要:
Reuse is always considered superior to materials and energy recovery in the waste hierarchy, a concept that also applies to Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). In practice, however, reuse has not been a commonly used end-of-life option. We compared policies and practices of reuse of WEEE in China and in the EU. This comparison can help identify knowledge gaps and reuse policy requirements, as well as implementation methods We also discuss potential scientific solutions for reuse of WEEE via analysis of stakeholders’ concerns. We found that although there are already reuse-related guidelines and standards in China, the policies need to be made more systematic like those of the EU, and they need to be more suitable for the specific challenges of China. We propose$ policy recommendations for reuse in order to facilitate sustainable management of WEEE, including integration of a reuse strategy into current management policy as well as the promotion of components reuse. Further, we also found that more studies on drivers and barriers to reuse are required to support more effective and efficient management.(来源:RCR期刊)
联系客服