物权案例汇编 | 法宝双语案例

北大法律信息网 今天

本期双语案例推送姚子帆与上海华侨国际教育服务有限公司服务合同、财产损害赔偿纠纷上诉案等物权案例。

目录

Contents

1.姚子帆与上海华侨国际教育服务有限公司服务合同、财产损害赔偿纠纷上诉案

Yao Zifan v. Shanghai Overseas Chinese International Education Service Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over service contract and compensation for property damage)

2. 绵阳骏祥电子设备有限责任公司与杨某某、程某某财产损害赔偿纠纷一案的再审民事判决书

Mianyang Junxiang Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. v. Yang and Cheng (civil judgment for retrial of case regarding dispute over compensation for property damages)

3.广元市茂成商贸有限责任公司与兰渝铁路有限责任公司探矿权纠纷上诉案

Guangyuan Maocheng Trading Co., Ltd. v. Lanyu Railway Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over exploration right)

一、姚子帆与上海华侨国际教育服务有限公司服务合同、财产损害赔偿纠纷上诉案

Yao Zifan v. Shanghai Overseas Chinese International Education Service Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over service contract and compensation for property damage)

【裁判要旨】

当事人在出国留学时被扣留并遣返回国，其要求中介机构承担违约赔偿责任，但无法举证证明中介机构是在履行合同的过程中构成违约，且双方已终止合同履行的，应认定中介服务机构不构成违约，不承担赔偿责任。

[Judgment Abstract] 

If a party is detained and repatriated while studying abroad and requires the intermediary service institution to assume the liabilities for the breach of contract, but cannot prove that the intermediary service institution constitutes a breach of contract during the performance of the contract, and in addition, both parties have terminated the performance of the contract, it shall be determined that the intermediary service institution does not constitute a breach of contract and assume any liability for compensation.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.89997357

[CLI Code] CLI.C.89997357(EN)

二、绵阳骏祥电子设备有限责任公司与杨某某、程某某财产损害赔偿纠纷一案的再审民事判决书

Mianyang Junxiang Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. v. Yang and Cheng (civil judgment for retrial of case regarding dispute over compensation for property damages)

【裁判摘要】

申请鉴定评估，属于当事人举证责任的内容，系当事人为了支持自己的诉讼主张，行使自己诉讼权利的行为。人民法院依据当事人的申请，委托具有相应资质的鉴定评估机构进行鉴定评估。鉴定机构接受人民法院的委托，按照法定的程序和方法所作出的评估报告，如果当事人在诉讼过程中没有提供相应的证据用以证明该评估报告存在法定无效的情形，故人民法院依法应当认定该评估报告有效。

[Judgment Abstract]

As part of the burden of proof, applying for identification and appraisal is the litigant's action of supporting their claims and exercising their litigation rights. After a litigant makes an application, a people's court will entrust a qualified agency to conduct identification and appraisal. Therefore, if an identification and appraisal agency issues an appraisal report according to statutory procedures and methods as entrusted by a people's court, and a party provides no evidence for the invalidity of the appraisal report in the course of proceedings, the people's court should determine such an appraisal report as valid, according to law.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.15669605

[CLI Code] CLI.C.15669605(EN)

三、广元市茂成商贸有限责任公司与兰渝铁路有限责任公司探矿权纠纷上诉案

Guangyuan Maocheng Trading Co., Ltd. v. Lanyu Railway Co., Ltd. (appeal of case regarding dispute over exploration right)

【裁判要旨】

当事人就因铁路建设项目损害探矿权如何进行补偿问题产生争议诉至法院后，当事人在法庭诉讼期间就补偿金额协商一致形成的和解协议，该协议对于当事人双方均有合同法上的约束性。人民法院可根据双方基于真实意思表示形成的和解协议当中一致认同的内容作为判决依据。

[Judgment Abstract]

After the parties brought action in the court regarding a dispute over compensation for the damage to exploration right arising from a railway construction project, the parties reached a settlement agreement on the amount of compensation during the court proceedings. This agreement should be binding upon the parties in accordance with the Contract Law. A people's court may deem the content of the settlement agreement agreed upon by the parties based on their true intention as a basis of judgment.

【法宝引证码】CLI.C.11509289

[CLI Code] CLI.C.11509289(EN)