作者：解螺旋.叶子
转载请注明来源：解螺旋，医生科研助手
论文被拒搞之事常有发生，甚至有些文章会连续被拒。然而有些审稿意见，让人在学术研究严肃、认真的前提下充分体会了下审稿人的幽默与诙谐，有的审稿意见甚至让人啼笑皆非。下面列举了一部分经典的审稿意见，让大家也见识一下什么叫史上最奇葩的评审意见。
第一个是已经流传很广了，也是最狠的一个：
The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about. I would suggest that we set up a fund that pays for the red wine reviewers may need to digest manuscripts like this one. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future.
翻译：这货的写作水平和展示的数据太流（sha）弊（bi）了，哥不得不提前下班，匆匆回家，然后花时间思考下人生。。。哥建议我们还是成立个基金，以买单审稿人审阅时可能需要的红酒，哥上火呀。请勿发表，并建议锁定该作者的电子邮件ID，避免此人日后继续投稿。。。
看过这个审稿意见后是不是被激起强烈的好奇心，想去看看到底是多牛的文章让审稿人如此暴躁。
接下来还有：
The journal editor stated that our manuscript was rejected. We were shocked that the reviewer’s comments read “fuck you” (handwritten on a torn strip of paper scotch-taped to the editor’s letter to us)
翻译：期刊编辑毙了我们的文章，因为审稿人意见是“哔~~~”（在回复编辑的信上写了张便条）
审稿人也要注意素质，素质。
I am generally very happy to provide extensive suggestions and comments on manuscripts, but this submission was an absolute waste of my time.
翻译：我平时还蛮喜欢给人家审稿提供意见的，但这篇绝对是浪费我的绳命。
这位就比上面的委婉多了嘛。
I found the paper a challenge to evaluate, expecting some profound methodological or theoretical insight. Yet none appeared to be forthcoming.
翻译：我觉得这篇文章试图去挑战发现一些高大上的方法和理论，然并卵。
The introduction, general approach and data analyses are somewhat anachronistic–this study would have been really interesting 10-15 years ago, but now it seems quite out of date.
翻译：十几年前这会是个挺有趣的研究，但现在。。。
还有些其他的比如....
Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!
翻译：拒发，这货的漏洞比我爷爷网眼背心上的洞还多！
The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style.
翻译：这篇文章问题太多了，特别是这个写作风格，简直摧残了哥身体里求生的意志。
Hopeless - Seems like they have been asleep and are not up on recent work on metagenomics.
简直没希望了他们....看来作者要么睡着了，要么完全没跟上宏基因组学的前沿发展。
最后，上个言简意赅，意犹未尽的。
“Not now, not ever.”
The End
联系客服
