打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
乳房局部快速放疗:十年随访结果
userphoto

2023.02.02 上海

关注

  乳房局部快速放疗又称部分乳腺短程照射加速部分乳房照射(APBI),与全乳放疗(WBI)相比,不仅可将放疗从5周缩短至1~5天,还可有效地减少对双侧乳房、皮肤、心脏、尤其是肺部的辐射暴露。近20年来,APBI的不同技术已被引入临床实践。若干回顾研究、若干二期试验和两项三期试验采用多导管间质近距离APBI,与外照射APBI外照射WBI(EBRT)相比,效果并不逊色。其他临床试验采用替代APBI技术(包括术中电子或50千伏光子、腔内球囊近距离放疗和三维适形或调强外照射放疗)结果尚无定论或是否定。欧洲近距离放疗协作组(GEC)欧洲肿瘤放疗学会(ESTRO)于2004年发起APBI大样本随机对照三期临床研究,对常规外照射WBI+瘤床补量多导管间质近距离APBI的效果进行比较。该研究1次登上《柳叶刀》正刊、2次登上《柳叶刀》肿瘤学分册,中位随访5年结果表明,APBI与WBI相比,同侧乳腺肿瘤复发率和生存率相似,后期副作用、美观效果和生活质量指标结局显著改善。那么,中位随访10年长期结果如何?

GEC-ESTRO APBI Trial (NCT00402519): APBI Versus EBRT Therapy After Breast Conserving Surgery for Low-risk Breast Cancer (Interstitial Brachytherapy Alone Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy After Breast Conserving Surgery for Low-risk Invasive Carcinoma and Low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Female Breast)

相关链接

  2023年2月1日,英国《柳叶刀》肿瘤学分册在线发表德国埃尔朗根大学医院、莱比锡大学医院、罗斯托克大学医院、基尔大学医院、奧芬巴赫萨那医院、雷根斯堡慈善兄弟会医院、维尔茨堡大学医院、埃尔朗根纽伦堡大学、匈牙利国家肿瘤研究所、塞梅维斯大学、奥地利维也纳大学综合医院、波兰居里夫人肿瘤中心研究所、布若祖夫喀尔巴阡山医院癌症中心、西班牙巴伦西亚肿瘤研究所、加泰罗尼亚肿瘤研究所、捷克马萨里克纪念癌症研究所、瑞士伯尔尼大学小岛医院的GEC-ESTRO APBI研究中位随访10年长期结果。

  该国际多中心非盲随机对照非劣效三期临床试验于2004年4月20日~2009年7月30日从奥地利、捷克、德国、匈牙利、波兰、西班牙、瑞士的16家医院和医疗中心入组年龄≥40岁早期乳腺浸润癌或导管原位癌保乳手术治疗患者1328例,按1∶1的比例集中随机分为两组:
  • EBRT组673例5周内将50戈瑞分割为25次外照射WBI+瘤床补量10戈瑞
  • APBI组655例5天内将30.1戈瑞分割为7次32.0戈瑞分割为8次50戈瑞分割为每天24小时每小时0.60~0.80戈瑞进行多导管近距离APBI


  患者和研究者对治疗分组均未设盲。主要终点为同侧局部复发,对接受治疗的人群进行分析;复发率差异(针对5年结果定义)非劣效临界值为3个百分点

  结果,EBRT组551例APBI组633例符合分析条件。

  中位随访10.36年(四分位:9.12~11.28),EBRT组与APBI组相比:
  • 10年局部复发率:1.58%比3.51%(95%置信区间:0.37~2.8、1.99~5.03)
  • 10年率组间差异:1.93%(95%置信区间:-0.018~3.87,P=0.074)


  EBRT组APBI组患者相比,10年无病生存率10年总生存率相似。



  完成7.5年和(或)10年随访的EBRT组393例APBI组470例患者相比:

  • 1级和2级不良事件发生率:60%比67%
  • 治疗相关3级后期副作用发生率:4%比1%(P=0.021)

  完成10年随访的EBRT组313例与APBI组375例患者相比,3级不良事件发生率最高为纤维化(2%比1%,P=0.56)。

  未见4级不良事件或治疗相关死亡。

  因此,该研究中位随访10年长期结果表明,早期乳腺癌患者保乳手术后多导管近距离APBI标准外照射WBI相比,治疗效果相似,后期副作用较少

相关链接



Lancet Oncol. 2023 Feb 1. IF: 54.433

Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Vratislav Strnad, Csaba Polgár, Oliver J Ott, Guido Hildebrandt, Daniela Kauer-Dorner, Hellen Knauerhase, Tibor Major, Jaroslaw Lyczek, Jose Luis Guinot, Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez, Pavel Slampa, Michael Allgauer, Kristina Lossl, Bülent Polat, Rainer Fietkau, Annika Schlamann, Alexandra Resch, Anna Kulik, Leo Arribas, Peter Niehoff, Ferran Guedea, Jürgen Dunst, Christine Gall, Wolfgang Uteron; Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology.

University Hospital Erlangen and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany; University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Sana Clinic, Offenbach, Germany; Hospital Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; University Hospital AKH Wien, Vienna, Austria; Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im Marii Skl odowskej, Warsaw, Poland; Podkarpacki Hospital Cancer Center Brzozów, Brzozów, Poland; Valencian Institute of Oncology Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Several randomised, phase 3 trials have investigated the value of different techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for patients with early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery compared with whole-breast irradiation. In a phase 3 randomised trial, we evaluated whether APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy is non-inferior compared with whole-breast irradiation. Here, we present the 10-year follow-up results.

METHODS: We did a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 16 hospitals and medical centres in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 40 years or older with early invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either whole-breast irradiation or APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy. Whole-breast irradiation was delivered in 25 daily fractions of 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with a supplemental boost of 10 Gy to the tumour bed, and APBI was delivered as 30.1 Gy (seven fractions) and 32.0 Gy (eight fractions) of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in 5 days or as 50 Gy of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy over 5 treatment days. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral local recurrence, analysed in the as-treated population; the non-inferiority margin for the recurrence rate difference (defined for 5-year results) was 3 percentage points. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00402519; the trial is complete.

FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2004, and July 30, 2009, 1328 female patients were randomly assigned to whole breast irradiation (n=673) or APBI (n=655), of whom 551 in the whole-breast irradiation group and 633 in the APBI group were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 10.36 years (IQR 9.12-11.28), the 10-year local recurrence rates were 1.58% (95% CI 0.37 to 2.8) in the whole-breast irradiation group and 3.51% (1.99 to 5.03) in the APBI group. The difference in 10-year rates between the groups was 1.93% (95% CI -0.018 to 3.87; p=0.074). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 and 2, in 234 (60%) of 393 participants in the whole-breast irradiation group and 314 (67%) of 470 participants in the APBI group, at 7.5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both. Patients in the APBI group had a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 late side-effects than those in the whole-breast irradiation group (17 [4%] of 393 for whole-breast irradiation vs seven [1%] of 470 for APBI; p=0.021; at 7.5-year or 10-year follow-up, or both). At 10 years, the most common type of grade 3 adverse event in both treatment groups was fibrosis (six [2%] of 313 patients for whole-breast irradiation and three [1%] of 375 patients for APBI, p=0.56). No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths have been observed.

INTERPRETATION: Postoperative APBI using multicatheter brachytherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with early breast cancer is a valuable alternative to whole-breast irradiation in terms of treatment efficacy and is associated with fewer late side-effects.

FUNDING: German Cancer Aid, Germany.

DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00018-9
本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
【热】打开小程序,算一算2024你的财运
已来·未来 | BC放疗之路(下)
最前沿 | 柳叶刀:发现更方便的乳房放疗新方法!
宫颈癌近距离放疗中靶区及危及器官勾画:GEC ESTRO 推荐
宫颈癌近距离放疗中靶区及危及器官勾画:GEC ESTRO
三阴乳腺癌的放射治疗(综述) - 丁香园
NCCN 乳腺癌临床实践指南2019.2版(6)
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服