没错，是100分啦！

图：Aristarkh Lentulov

因为某个叫罗什么玩意儿的狗逼（说句掏心窝子的话吧，这种垃圾根本没资格被我完整提到一次）写的一篇low逼文章里点名点到了我，断章取义，然后引来一堆妖怪来骂我的，今天刚出炉的妖怪，这些妖怪对自己也是够狠的，为了骂我舍得点击关注，先看大屏幕。

好，继续。口罩的问题我是怎么说了，我说国外的疾控中心和各种医学专家都不曾强调过健康人必须戴口罩。

来，看看《柳叶刀》上的原文：

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which originated in Wuhan, China, in December, 2019, has been declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO.

By March 2, 2020, 80 026 confirmed cases had been reported in China, causing 2009 deaths, and the epidemic had spread to 25 countries around the world.

On Jan 20, 2020, China declared the disease a second-class infectious disease but has introduced management measures for a first-class infectious disease (considered the most dangerous category of infection). Most areas of the country have adopted public health first-level response measures (considered the highest level of response). In the face of the rapidly spreading disease and a large number of infected people, there is an urgent need for effective infection prevention and control measures. However, some of the measures that have been introduced have no scientific basis and have proven to be ineffective.

First, although COVID-19 is spread by the airborne route, air disinfection of cities and communities is not known to be effective for disease control and needs to be stopped. The widespread practice of spraying disinfectant and alcohol in the sky, on roads, vehicles, and personnel has no value; moreover, large quantities of alcohol and disinfectant are potentially harmful to humans and should be avoided.

Second, in the use of personal protective equipment, we should try to distinguish different risk factors, adopt different epidemic prevention measures, and reduce the waste of personal protective equipment, as these resources are already in short supply. Although surgical masks are in widespread use by the general population, there is no evidence that these masks prevent the acquisition of COVID-19, although they might slightly reduce the spread from an infected patient. High-filtration masks such as N95 masks and protective clothing (goggles and gowns) should be used in hospitals where health-care workers are in direct contact with infected patients.

Third, the practice of blocking traffic and lockdown of villages is of no value for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, some countries have suspended flights to and from China, and prevented Chinese people from travelling to their countries; both of these actions violate WHO International Health Regulations.

Similarly, in community prevention and control of the disease, the measures taken by individual villages and communities to seal off roads are of no value.

Such measures could result in civil unrest and reduce compliance with infection prevention and control advice.

Fourth, public health education must be based on scientific evidence to reduce the anxiety and distress caused by misinformation. In particular, epidemiological findings need to be reported in a timely and objective manner so that they can be accurately assessed and interpreted. The risk of transmission with brief contact (less than 15 min face-to-face contact) or infection onset after 14 days of exposure to a known infected person (the estimated maximum incubation period) is low and should not be over-exaggerated. Misinformation spreads panic among the general population and is not conducive to implementation of epidemic control measures.

Fifth, WHO has made it clear that there are currently no known effective treatments for COVID-19 and does not recommend the use of antiviral drugs, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, or traditional Chinese medicine. Despite this, there have been reports of the use of oseltamivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, prednisone, antibiotics, and traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

Care should be taken to not give patients drugs of unknown efficacy, which might be detrimental to critically ill patients with COVID-19; clinical trials are urgently required in this context.

Likewise, the development of a vaccine is an urgent public health priority.

COVID-19 is an emerging infectious disease of global public health concern. Efforts to control the COVID-19 epidemic are likely to require an evidence-based, multifactorial approach. First, there is a need to limit human-to-human transmission, including reducing secondary infections among close contacts and health-care workers, preventing transmission amplification events, and preventing further international spread. Second, there is a need to rapidly identify, isolate, and provide optimised care for patients. Third, we need to identify and reduce transmission from the animal source or sources. Fourth, we need to address crucial uncertainties such as clinical severity, extent of transmission and infection, and treatment options, and accelerate the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. We also need to minimise social disruption and economic impact through international, collaborative and multisectoral approaches. Most importantly, we need to communicate the epidemiology and risks of COVID-19 clearly, both to health-care workers and to the general population, and to implement infection prevention and control measures that are based on sound scientific principles.

We declare no competing interests. This work was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China ( grant number 017YFC1200203 ) and the Mega-project of Science Research of China ( grant number 2018ZX10733402-004 ).

抱歉抱歉，说实话，这么全英文引用确实有点难为人了，过来骂我的傻逼们能看懂吗？所以你看我是很贴心的，降低点难度，就读一下加粗加黑的部分。哎呀算了，我用谷歌给你们翻一下，大概是说，对着天空，道路，车辆和人，乱喷各种消毒液是有害无益。没有证据支持大众戴外科口罩能防病。

好，再看看国内上个月出的解读《关于印发公众科学戴口罩指引的通知》看第一条就行了。现在呢？不知道你们去过公园没有，我每个周末都去，空旷大自然，正当你沉醉其中，保安会过来说，请戴上口罩！

外国的专家有没有可能是错的，但我们这些赶过来骂我的妖怪是对的？

当然了，简直太有可能了！骂我的妖怪们多牛逼啊，看几篇low逼自媒体写的煽情的自豪骄傲的公众号文章就跟着四处征战，所有持有不同意见的人都会被他们挂出来要果断干死。只是这些小傻逼们这辈子可能都想不通，如果未来的整个言论气氛都是如此肃杀，这帮人未来只会垂泪看着自己喜欢的东西被另一波更年轻更狂热更没文化更狠的新生代妖怪集体杀死。

另外，就算这些专家是错的，专家尤其还是外国专家凭什么是对的嘛。但是我选择了相信世界上最悠久及最受重视的同行评审性质的医学期刊《柳叶刀》的文章而不是一群文盲。这有啥问题吗？我也跟着错了是我的事。妖怪们就是分不清，任何一个人可以有权利选择相信谬论。

对，现在不少老外也戴口罩了，但这件事跟外国专家并不强调健康人士戴口罩有什么矛盾之处吗？

外国专家说抗生素激素重要等毫无证据表明对治疗新冠有作用，你也可以吃啊。谁拦着你了？谁敢我的天哪，人家要吃药还不让呢？也许某些配方的中草药就是很神奇，就把你们家邻居的新冠肺炎给治好了呢。吃吧，吃起来。任何人要是觉得害怕当然可以穿防护服睡觉，可以戴着口罩吃饭。都是值得赞赏的防疫行为嘛。

各种观点满天飞，相信什么是每个人自己的事。我这种不懂医学的普通人更相信一些我认为值得相信的专家，没必要去听中国的一些傻逼自媒体们在煽情。我若错了我活该，我不怨谁，更不会去骂谁。

你们不要劝我什么别生气了。我生气不生气这不重要，而且我还能多生气，上面的脏话就是为了表达的节奏，跟生气没几把毛关系。

这次疫情我们取得的伟大胜利之一，至少是意外收获吧，就是收获了一群又一群的疯狗，只要你敢肯定外国，不不不，哪里敢肯定卧槽，仅仅是觉得不应该那么草率地挖苦，仅仅是思考下“群体免疫”这种提法背后的思考依据是啥，就得被钉在耻辱柱上。我们必须是最牛逼的。

好了好了，其实上面那些都是气话啦。呵呵，我们当然是第一名啦，是100分！身为土生土长的中国人，我很自豪。我衷心祝福祖国繁荣昌盛，大家都是一家人，那些骂我的妖怪也是我们人类的好朋友。

祝福不分物种，珍爱地球，唯有自豪和骄傲不可辜负。