打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
Jim Cramer的投资25条之五

Diversify to Control Risk

If you control the downside, the upside will take care of itself. I have always believed that to be the case. But controlling the downside means managing the risk.

The biggest risk out there is sector risk. I don’t care how great a tech stock was in 2000 – even eBay (EBAY – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) and Yahoo! (YHOO – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) – if you had all your eggs in that sector, you got scrambled. Same with pharma in the last several years. Or oil in 1982, when I broke into the business.

What can keep you from getting nailed by sector risk, which is about 50% of the entire risk of owning a stock?

Diversification.

It’s the only investment concept that truly works for everyone. If you can mix up enough different sectors in your portfolio, you can’t be hit by one of the myriad perfect storms that come our way far more often than you would think.

Why aren’t more people diversified? Many amateurs don’t know the stocks they buy. They end up with stocks that are frighteningly similar. When I started playing “Am I Diversified” on my radio show in 2001, I was blown away by how few people knew just how undiversified they really were.

I still field quite a few calls from people who genuinely think that owning Sun Microsystems (SUNW – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating), EMC (EMC – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) and Microsoft (MSFT – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) is a form of diversification because they own servers and software!

They think that having Pfizer (PFE – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) and Procter & Gamble (PG – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) makes them safe!

And no matter how much I may like oil stocks at any given moment, I can’t countenance a portfolio made up of ExxonMobil (XOM – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating), Chesapeake Energy (CHK – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating) and Halliburton (HAL – news – Cramer’s Take – Rating).

An undiversified portfolio is not just an amateur mistake, though. Many professionals don’t like to be diversified because of the bizarre way money is run in this country. If you concentrate all your bets in one sector and the sector takes off, you will beat pretty much every diversified fund out there. That’s the nature of the beast. You then can market yourself as a huge success and get profiled by every magazine and take in capital from unsuspecting folk who don’t know how much risk you truly are taking on.

Both amateur and professional are wrong; controlling risk is the key to long-term rewards and controlling risk means being diversified at all times.

本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
【热】打开小程序,算一算2024你的财运
CRAs pose risks to P2P lending sites
40篇英语短文搞定高考3500个单词(VIII)
读外刊:长句结构分析221114
痴呆患者驾驶风险评估与管理的最新指南
market conduct examination
专科分类
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服