打开APP
userphoto
未登录

开通VIP,畅享免费电子书等14项超值服

开通VIP
山西曲沃中学校高二下期中英语试卷(带解析)_6
In 1996, John Tierney suggested in the New York Times Magazine article that “recycling is garbage.” He wrote, “The money spent on recycling programs should have been spent on real social and environmental problems. Recycling programs not only increase energy use and pollution, but also cost more money than the disposal (处理) of plain old garbage. Recycling may be the most wasteful activity in modern America.”
 
Environmental groups were quick to express their disagreement. They wrote reports on how recycling programs in cities can reduce pollution and cost less than regular garbage pickup and disposal. Michael Shapiro, an official of the US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), said that “recycling can be good value for money, although there’s still room for improvements.”
 
But in 2002, New York City, a pioneer of recycling, found that its recycling program was losing money, so it stopped glass and plastic recycling. Other major cities watched closely to see how New York was dealing with its remaining program (the city never stopped paper recycling). But then it closed its last landfill (垃圾填埋地), and private companies out of New York raised prices due to the increased workload of carrying away and disposing New York’s garbage. As a result, glass and plastic recycling became profitable for the city again, and New York brought the program back. According to Cecil Adams of The Chicago Reader, the lessons learned by New York are relevant everywhere. He believes that, if managed correctly, recycling programs should cost cities less than garbage disposal.
 
Even though the benefits of recycling over disposal are many, keep in mind that it better serves the environment to “reduce and reuse” before recycling is even considered as a choice.
 
【小题1】Why did John Tierney think “recycling is garbage”?A.Because he considered recycling a wasteful activity.B.Because he didn’t think recycling was a new idea.C.Because he found few people would like to recycle.D.Because he didn’t like the environmental groups.【小题2】Which argument was put forward by the environmental groups?A.Recycling technologies are mature.B.Recycling programs save money.C.Recycling programs cause pollution.D.Recycling technologies are valueless.【小题3】Why did other cities watch closely to see how New York was doing?A.Because New York was doing extremely well.B.Because they didn’t want to have a recycling programC.Because they felt worried about the waste of money.D.Because New York was running a new recycling program.【小题4】Which of the following would the author most probably recommend?A.Always bring your own shopping bag when you go shopping.B.Always put your shopping bag into the dustbin after use.C.Never go shopping where shopping bags are offered for free.D.Never use a shopping bag which is not recycled.
 
                       
本站仅提供存储服务,所有内容均由用户发布,如发现有害或侵权内容,请点击举报
打开APP,阅读全文并永久保存 查看更多类似文章
猜你喜欢
类似文章
【热】打开小程序,算一算2024你的财运
NGOs Want to Clean Up China’s Countryside. They’ll...
China punishes factories for pollution violations
外刊精读丨卫报:回收塑料可能并不能解决污染问题?!
使用DID或Event study开展政策评估的JDE最新文章整理!
Pollution problem serious: Survey
厨余粉碎机,不完全选购指南
更多类似文章 >>
生活服务
热点新闻
分享 收藏 导长图 关注 下载文章
绑定账号成功
后续可登录账号畅享VIP特权!
如果VIP功能使用有故障,
可点击这里联系客服!

联系客服